General |
Product Name | 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Optical Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon EF |
Brand | Sigma |
Color | Black |
Model Number | 730954 |
Color Category | Black |
Additional Accessories Included | Dust cap; lens cap |
Additional Dimension |
Product Length with Lens Closed | 10.6 inches |
Product Diameter | 4.7 inches |
Compatibility |
Camera Model Family | Canon 1DX, Canon 7D Mark II, Canon 5D Mark II, Canon T4i, Canon 70D, Canon T6s, Canon T3, Canon 5D Mark III, Canon T2i, Canon T5i, Canon T3i, Canon 5DS/5DS R, Canon 6D, Canon SL1, Canon 60D, Canon T5, Canon T6i |
Lens Series | Canon EF |
Brand Compatibility | Canon |
Warranty |
Manufacturer's Warranty - Labor | 4 years |
Manufacturer's Warranty - Parts | 4 years |
Imaging |
In-Lens Image Stabilization | Yes |
Auto/Manual Focus | Automatic/manual |
Field Of View | 39.6 degrees |
Zoom Type | Manual |
Comment:
Both sample shots were taken at 600mm (no action shots due to privacy concerns; however, they were very sharp as well). The lens produces a nice bokeh (quality of out-of-focus blur)I used this lens (the Canon version, model …54; the Nikon version is …55) with a Metabones adapter connected to a Sony A7RIII. The AF worked intermittently–which is not the fault of either the lens or the camera; no one promised that this kludge would work–so my focus is primarily on the image quality.When the AF worked, it worked fast and accurately (AF would stop working, which required turning the camera off then on to regain AF). I had very few misses, and most of the shots were sharp. I tested its IQ against my Nikon 200-500mm–I have a very sharp version of that lens. I believe the AF is faster than the Nikon but did not directly compare the two. I shot a “Zombie Run”, mostly action shots, and took over 2000 pictures. Images were sharp and well saturated (I really like the colors) at every focal length. At 600mm, there was noticeably more detail with the Sigma. I could not say the same when I tested the Sigma 150-600mm Sport against the Nikon. At normal size, you probably wouldn’t notice the difference, but the additional magnification would be invaluable if you need to crop substantially.The downside is that the Sigma is bigger and heavier than the Nikon, which is a big and heavy lens in its own right. The Sigma is fatiguing if you need to hold it in shooting position for long (many will prefer to use the lens with a tripod/monopod). However, it is smaller than the Sigma 150-600mm Sport and balances better.Overall, this lens is a tremendous accomplishment by Sigma. If Sigma doesn’t produce a version in Sony E-mount, I am considering buying it in Nikon mount and getting rid of my Nikon 200-500mm. The new Sigma is just that good.In sum, I do not recommend using the new Sigma “Bigma” with an adapter for Sony E-mount. However, for Canon and Nikon, the Bigma is undoubtedly the best consumer-grade long zoom produced to date.